quite a bit has happened in the last month and once again i’m faced with a personal struggle: do i try to write about all the cool things that i’ve seen and done (makings of a very long post); or do i just focus on the most important developments of my life (keeping this thing much shorter)?
let’s go for door number two.
so i’m back in indiana and, for the immediate future, back for awhile. why you ask? quite simple: i was fired from my job on thursday night.
yeah, fired. they called it “let go,” but it was a solid firing. yet it was so much more than that – i’d call it an ideological purge.
i’ve been talking with scores of people on the phone for the last two days about the topic and, honestly, i thought i had the energy to retell the story. at this moment, i simply don’t. i wrote a lengthy e-mail about it the day after the ax fell and i’ll just copy and paste. you know you want to judge my laziness – i’m o.k. with it.
———————————————————
As many of you know by now, Green Corps has officially fired me as of 8:30PM yesterday. I had a conversation with David for an hour and fifteen minutes, during which he expressed to me that it was his final decision and that there was not possibility for me to discuss the situation in hopes of that decision being changed.
The official reason that David gave me for terminating my training experience was that he did not think that I was a good fit for Green Corps and that I was not making steady and consistent progress on improving upon my engagement within the program. In that we are a small group, I know that you all know me fairly well. Therefore, I hope that you, like me, are able to recognized that this reason holds absolutely no water and is not based on any form of sound rationale. My thoughts are that this decision was made more upon the fact that Green Corps and the individuals that compose its central staff are lacking in their ability to be a true training program and handle true critical thought and constructive dialogue. I can confidently say that it I believe that my termination was made out of a weak, fearful, and completely closed perspective.
Three things should be known:
1.) This decision was not mutual – throughout our conversation, I made an consistent effort to work with David to find a solution for Green Corps and myself to continued working together. All of my efforts were moot - David had no interest in having an open-mind nor in listening to my questions. Despite going point by point on how I have made a consistent effort to improve myself within the program, maintain a constructive, open, and positive attitude, and have faith that my struggles were a normal part of a difficult training program and that I would be successful if I simply “stuck with it,” David could not adequately counter my points with rational points of his own and maintained a broken record of “I’m sorry you feel that way – Clearly we aren’t seeing eye to eye – But this is my final decision.”
2.) This decision was not proceeded by fair warning. My conversation last night with David was the first time that I was ever made aware that I was not progressing fast enough by Green Corps standards. As any logical person would think, such information would come to light during the time specifically set aside by the program for such information – the self-evaluation. However, during our hour and a half self-evaluation conversation (which I came away from positive and excited to start my work in Minneapolis), David never once mentioned my pace, nor my fit with the program as a weakness or concern. Further, these words have never passed the lips of any of the central staff. The only weakness that David did mentioned after no less than four listed strengths was “Delegating Responsibility and Trusting Others to Carry Them Out.” Further, my conversations with the central staff in October training were all positive and I felt comfortable in their willingness to work with me under all circumstances. Given this and the fact that I expected any and all concerns of the staff to come to light during the self-evaluation, my termination under such ridiculous terms seems surreal and took me by complete surprise.
3.) The grounds for my termination are without merit and run contradictory to the fundamental tenets of a train/education process. In my mind, training is built upon an open and honest exchange within critical dialogue. There is no failing in a training or education progress that is built upon this foundation, save a complete refusal to participate or an unwillingess to seek improvement. I am not without fault in these circumstances. In that I am one half of the relationship between Green Corps and myself, I am willing to bear some of the burden. I am guilty of not immediately agreeing with Green Corps and asking questions when, perhaps, I should have been more docile and tight-lipped However, I feel that these are not faults and that the failing in this situation falls most squarely and heavily upon the shoulders of the central staff. From the beginning of this experience, I have struggled with the program. I have been and will continue to be a mind that values positive critical analysis and seek constructive growth despite struggles. From each negative experience or uncomfortable situation from this program, I have always made an effort to seek the positive lesson that is omnipresent. However, Green Corps fired me for qualities they asked me to embody: honesty, openness on communication, and a willingness to try things that were uncomfortable in good faith of the program. Though I cannot say that I was 100% successful (I am human and perfectionism is, as Anne Lamott writes “the voice of the oppressor”) but that I woke everyday with a determination to better embody these qualities and improve my Green Corps experience. When the central staff asked my to embody these qualities, I assumed that they were planning to embody those qualities themselves. Given the recent experience, I can confidently state that David and the central staff have failed to exercise honesty, open communication, and a willingness to engage in uncomfortable situations with faith of the end product. Given that we are only quarter of the way into the program, for David to make such a decision that impacts not only my life but also the program seem premature, short-sighted, and simply ignorant. As much as I’d like to think that David and the central staff possess the ability of foresight, I doubt this given the point that we are in the program and their level of sagely wisdom.
—————————————–
so yes – i’m happy with being done with green corps. they were, are, and most likely will continue to be a bogus organization. i am bummed that my work with the remaining organizers has come to an end for now. i was excited to see them in colorado and work with them in florida. but my life is wide open. as eli has written in his blog, happiness lies in the appreciation of life. i am fully appreciating the possibility of doing absolutely anything. i’m thinking of three weeks in seattle for a proper visit, a trip to cuba in the summer, and maybe a month hiking the pacific crest trail. if any of these things interest you, let’s be associates.